<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] RE: GNSO Review: Updated information (was ICANN Board call)
Yes, of course. See you in DC over the weekend. I arrive on
Thursday evening.
Liz
.....................................................
Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob
On 22 Feb 2006, at 11:42, Marilyn Cade wrote:
Thanks, Liz. Very helpful to have the list of all the links in one
place.
However, I still have some questions. Since you are traveling over
for the Council Working group meeting in D.C., we can discuss this
topic under AOB on the agenda.
From: Liz Williams [mailto:liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:41 AM
To: Marilyn Cade
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pritz@xxxxxxxxx; jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx;
twomey@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: GNSO Review: Updated information (was ICANN Board call)
Marilyn and Council Colleagues
As the senior staff member responsible for the GNSO Review, I will
soon be able to provide much more detailed information on the way
in which the Review will be proceeding now that the appropriate
formalities from last night's Board meeting are completed.
For the benefit of Council members who have not been involved in
the establishment of the Review, I've provided some easy to
navigate background. I hope this also helps other Council members
with their preparation for the Review.
1. The July 2005 Luxembourg Resolution initiated the Review and
started a process of discussion between the Board, Council, and
Staff on the establishment of the Terms of Reference. (http://
www.icann.org/minutes/resolutions-15jul05.htm#p4)
2. The December 2005 Vancouver Resolution approved the Terms of
Reference which had been developed in consultation with individual
members of the Board, Council and Staff (http://www.icann.org/
minutes/resolutions-04dec05.htm.) A 21 day public comment period
about the draft Terms of Reference was conducted between 27 October
2005 and 17 November 2005. The archive of comments is at http://
forum.icannorg/lists/gnso-review-tor/
3. The 14 December 2005 ICANN website posting sought requests for
proposals from independent evaluators (http://www.icann.org/
announcements/announcement-14dec05.htm).
4. The 21 Feb 2006 Board Resolution approved the appointment of an
independent team of evaluators but is not available online as yet.
5. Background documents on the GNSO Review can be found at http://
www.icann.org/gnso/review-tor-background-04nov05.htm. These
include the recommendations from the GNSO Council Review, the
relevant ICANN By laws and other helpful information.
6. The Terms of Reference can be found at http://www.icann.org/
gnso/review-reference-terms-27oct05.htm.
7. Article IV Section 4 of ICANN's Bylaws (http://www.icann.org/
general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-08apr05.htm#IV) gives guidance about
the conduct of the review and I've copied it here for easy
reference. I have added some emphasis which may provide
clarification about the process.
1. The Board shall cause a periodic review, if feasible no less
frequently than every three years, of the performance and operation
of each Supporting Organization, each Supporting Organization
Council, each Advisory Committee (other than the Governmental
Advisory Committee), and the Nominating Committee by an entity or
entities independent of the organization under review. The goal of
the review, to be undertaken pursuant to such criteria and
standards as the Board shall direct, shall be to determine (i)
whether that organization has a continuing purpose in the ICANN
structure, and (ii) if so, whether any change in structure or
operations is desirable to improve its effectiveness. The results
of such reviews shall be posted on the Website for public review
and comment, and shall be considered by the Board no later than the
second scheduled meeting of the Board after such results have been
posted for 30 days. The consideration by the Board includes the
ability to revise the structure or operation of the parts of ICANN
being reviewed by a two-thirds vote of all members of the Board.
Finally, ICANN Bylaws Article X, Section 5 which deals with the
GNSO's operating procedures.
Of course, any further questions are more than welcome.
Liz
.....................................................
Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob
On 22 Feb 2006, at 01:43, Marilyn Cade wrote:
The fact that the gNSO review has been finalized, a briefing of the
Council on the “proposed approach” is of concern. This was supposed
to be a joint effort by the Board and the Council and we are sadly
without "visibility" into the process, or the outline, or the
proposal. Or the funding amount, which I have asked for twice, on
Council calls.
This is something that I propose that Council bring up with the
President/CEO and Senior staff. I had noted it on the Board agenda,
but never envisioned that there would be an approval, without
discussion with the Council.
No doubt that is planned, but Senior Staff are seeking still to
schedule a discussion with Council.
We can help them by initiating this discussion. Let’s spend five
minutes on agenda bashing on our upcoming Council meeting on Friday.
Marilyn Cade
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:57 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] ICANN Board Call
Dear Council Members:
The ICANN Board just concluded its teleconference today and took the
following actions.
(1) Approval of São Paulo, Brazil as the venue for the 2006 ICANN
annual
meeting the first week in December; and
(2) Approved funds to pay the evaluators for their work in connection
with the review of the GNSO;
Although there was a discussion regarding the VeriSign settlement
negotiation, there was no action taking. There is a scheduled call for
next week 28-Feb-2006. Although the Chair and secretariat have not yet
finalized the agenda for that call it is most likely to involve
further
VeriSign discussions as well as those items which have not yet been
completed from today's call. As always, I will try to keep the council
informed of any developments.
Best regards,
Michael D. Palage
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|