ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] PDP timelines

  • To: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] PDP timelines
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 15:49:24 +1100
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcYRruRl/bhwn/7bQNW2Vtn94Xqv7wABFe8w
  • Thread-topic: [council] PDP timelines

Hello Avri,

> >
> 
> I think in most cases, in my experience at least, projects that do  
> not complete on time are reviewed and extended only if warranted.  

Agreed.
 
> Automatic sunset that disregards complexity or issues does 
> not seem the best alternative to me.  It seems that any 
> notion of concluding a PDP must require a definitive action, 
> e.g. a vote, as opposed to some automatic mechanism.
> 

I would have thought that should be the other way around.  Any extension
of a deadline/project requires a definitive vote.

Regards,
Bruce




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>