ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Draft Call for papers, new gTLD PDP

  • To: "'ICANNSoph'" <sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Draft Call for papers, new gTLD PDP
  • From: "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:22:54 +0100
  • Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <fdcd4ef30512280640l205f25b0s@mail.gmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcYLvgFK02bjmCLZQy6g37CMI7kmmwAw8uoQ

Hi Sophia,

Thanks for your comments and thanks for the link! As to your question on
adding something on IDN - the agreed PDP structure is to run IDN as a
separate track, so adding it here would unduly confuse matters.

Best regards (and I would happily swap the snow here for some sunshine..)

Olof

 

  _____  

From: ICANNSoph [mailto:sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 3:41 PM
To: olof nordling
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Draft Call for papers, new gTLD PDP

 

 

Greetings Olof:

 

Hi Mawaki as well... I agree with you.   The draft seem fine.  Regrading
your ? Olof,  on adding additional questions, would it be appropriate to add
a question on the IDN side?.

 

The following link might also be of interest to you all!


http://www.wgig.org/docs/ISOC-November2.pdf

 

Wish I had a white x-mas like Brussels...it seem more sunshine than rain
where I am at in Ca!

Sophia
 

On 27/12/05, olof nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

Dear all,

As you may recall we have a Call for Papers regarding the new gTLD PDP to
write for announcement in early January. I have attached a very first draft
to this effect and I would sincerely appreciate comments on the draft from
those of you who happen to be on-line during these largely holiday-dominated
days. The objective would be to have it distributed and posted on 3 January.


The draft includes the ToR in extenso (the announcement on the ICANN front
page will have to be shorter, cutting the ToR part). Would this be enough or
should we specify another layer of questions - if so, which questions? 

 

I'm looking forward to receiving your views on any aspects of the draft.

 

Very best regards from Brussels (just lightly covered in snow, to mark the
season)

Olof 

 - 
Sophia Bekele
Voice/Fax: xxx-xxx-xxxx
Mob:xxx-xxx-xxxx
sophiabekele@xxxxxxx
www.cbsintl.com



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>