Re: [council] RE: Council report required for the Board on the recently approved WHOIS recommendation

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I understand how much consultation has gone into coming up to the  
compromise.  But has the compromise itself been commented on?
In any case, I think that every stage of recommendation and decision  
should be subject to public comment.  so as it moves from the council  
with its responsibility for recommending policy to the board with its  
responsibility for due diligence and for approving policy, i think  
there is a reasonable opportunity for public comment.
a.

On 22 dec 2005, at 11.10, Thomas Keller wrote:

> just to make my point clearer. I don´t see why yet another
> round of public comments would do any good, the arguments haven´t
> changed for the last three years and that is the "compromise" the
> taskforce came up with.
>
> tom
>
> Am 22.12.2005 schrieb Thomas Keller:
> > Avri,
> >
> > this recommendation has already been through various iterations
> > of public comments at the taskforce and council level. What is
> > presented to the board now is the final product of ICANNs policy
> > body for gTLDs created through the ICANN policy process. As the
> > board is not policy body itself it should not have a look at the
> > recomendation in that respect but rather in terms of possible flaws
> > or errors making the policy unworkable.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > tom