<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Letter from WIPO to ICANN
- To: <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Letter from WIPO to ICANN
- From: <Lucy.Nichols@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:28:30 -0600
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcXt9ikWMLH5HVdfTk6gVSJ0BCZQxwAACKWg
- Thread-topic: [council] Letter from WIPO to ICANN
Notwithstanding the recent events in Tunisia, I am quite surprised at
the tone of the letter as it is terribly over-confident. As Bruce
pointed out, there is a major flaw in their interpretation of the ICANN
process and I think that needs to be immediately clarified.
Lucy
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Bret Fausett
>Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 7:15 PM
>To: Bruce Tonkin
>Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [council] Letter from WIPO to ICANN
>
> > I note below that there is a fundamental flaw in the
>understanding > of the process.
>
>I suspect that WIPO knows well the requirements of the ICANN
>process but is using the new pressure from governments in WSIS
>to push forward an unpopular agenda item.
>
> Bret
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|