ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] GNSO Review TOR + Background Information

  • To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'Ross Rader'" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] GNSO Review TOR + Background Information
  • From: "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:40:11 -0700
  • Cc: "'Liz Williams'" <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <0C989DB6-3B75-4F7E-BE33-78E08FA2C23F@acm.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcWuc65h9LLhFQ3ORUOwUIQvkVzC2wAABriA

Dear all,

I don't mean to confuse matters or prejudge the development and drafting
work on the terms of reference, but FYI the original source of the text on
the purpose of the review came from the ICANN bylaws:

Section 4. PERIODIC REVIEW OF ICANN STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS

    1. The Board shall cause a periodic review, if feasible no less
frequently than every three years, of the performance and operation of each
Supporting Organization, each Supporting Organization Council, each Advisory
Committee (other than the Governmental Advisory Committee), and the
Nominating Committee by an entity or entities independent of the
organization under review.  The goal of the review, to be undertaken
pursuant to such criteria and standards as the Board shall direct, shall be
to determine (i) whether that organization has a continuing purpose in the
ICANN structure, and (ii) if so, whether any change in structure or
operations is desirable to improve its effectiveness. 

Available at http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#IV


All the best, Maria



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:29 PM
To: Ross Rader
Cc: Liz Williams; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Review TOR + Background Information

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I think this is a better wording.

One recommendation below:

On 31 aug 2005, at 15.38, Ross Rader wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
> Proposed:
>
> 3.2     The GNSO Review is designed to analyse:
>
> o    the current and continued role of the GNSO in the ICANN  
> structure,

s/continued/continuing/

> o    and recommend what changes in its structure or operations, or  
> those of
> ICANN itself, may be desirable to improve its effectiveness.
>

a.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFDFiENzUL36xoPd70RAo1NAJ9rMEEfkQhjFaV/6PD8ctgGJ07XmQCgvFV8
eMu5MlpnSE6Hk5OFK34DvIY=
=fun6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>