Re: [council] Should we go ahead with the teleconference scheduled for 17 July 2003?

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I second this motion.

tom

Am 11.07.2003 schrieb Bruce Tonkin:
> Hello All,
> 
> We have scheduled a GNSO teleconference for 17 July 2003.
> (see http://www.dnso.org/meetings.html).
> 
> I am looking at formulating an agenda, and so far I have:
> - update ICANN President's working group to consider WIPO
> recommendations ( I haven't been able to get in touch with Paul Twomey
> on this yet)
> - staff managers report on UDRP (we haven't received this from ICANN
> staff yet)
> - budget report (mainly an update on transition to direct ICANN
> management of GNSO website and secretariat)
> - WHOIS Privacy steering group update (nothing has happened since
> Montreal)
> 
> We don't have any substantive policy documents to consider at this stage
> (7 days prior to the meeting).
> 
> I recommend that we cancel the teleconference scheduled for 17 July, and
> plan for the next scheduled conference on 14 August 2003.
> 
> In the meantime I will continue to work with the WHOIS Privacy Steering
> group to select a chair, and establish contact with Paul Twomey
> regarding the WIPO recommendations and the need for the UDRP report
> (which is well overdue).  I also want to ensure that the outcome of the
> deletes task force is properly communicated to ICANN and the GAC to
> ensure it is ready for decision by the ICANN Board at its next meeting.
> 
> Please let me know if there is any substantial reason to hold a meeting
> on 17 July 2003.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> Chair
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w