New gTLD committee teleconference

New gTLD Committee Proposed Agenda

Thursday 26 July at 12:00 UTC

Pending Action List [PDF, 41K]

Recommendation Status [PDF, 77K]

0 - Start of meeting (10 min)

roll call

statements of interests update

agenda review

1 - review status of recommendations (10 min)

confirm that current chart contains an accurate picture

- this includes review of results from last meeting

2 - In IG (P) (20 min)

- Use of 'detriment' versus 'material harm' in IG P.

- alternate wording defining 'detriment'

- h1) detriment

The objector must provide sufficient evidence to allow the panel to determine that there would be a likelihood of detriment to the rights or legitimate interests of the community or to users more widely.

- h2) detriment

The objector must provide verifiable or supported(1) evidence to allow the panel to determine that there would be a detriment, and the extent thereof(2), to the rights or legitimate interests of the community or to the users more widely.

(1) please, if such thing is available, replace by an adjective that would suit (also) the case of prospective detriment or rather actual detriment whose _effects_ will become _material_ only in the future.

(2) I think evidence is needed not only to establish detriment, but the extent of such detriment (may be replaced by a better wording if not Ok.)

3 - In #20 (15 min)

Is the objection panel procedure a matter of

- binary (yes/no) decisions

- or a mediation process

(ref Bruce's email on Rec #20)

4 - Wording consistency between Rec #3 and rec #6 (15 min)

(ref Liz's question)

5 - any new implementation questions that the staff has, (15 min)

esp on numbers 6, 20, P and Q.

6 - review action items (10 min)

- are other meetings required?

7 - other issues (10 min)