New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP
September 2019 Newsletter
|
|
The full Working Group is currently meeting twice weekly for 90 minutes to complete substantive review of public comments on its
Initial Report
and
Supplemental Initial Report
. Through this review, the Working Group is determining how to take into account the comments received and what changes, if any, need to be made to the recommendations contained in the Final Report.
To support the review, the Working Group is using a series of summary documents that provide an overview of the comments received on each topic included in the reports:
- Overarching Issues: including topics Continuing Subsequent Procedures, Predictability, Applications Assessed in Rounds, Different TLD Types, Application Submission Limits, Accreditation Programs (RSP Pre-Approval), Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice, Global Public Interest, Applicant Freedom of Expression, and Universal Acceptance.
- Pre-Launch Activities: including topics Applicant Guidebook, Communications, and Systems.
- Application Submission: including topics Application Fees, Variable Fees, Application Submission Period, Applicant Support, Terms and Conditions, Application Queuing, and Application Change Requests.
- Application Evaluation/Criteria: including topics Reserved Names, IGO/INGO Protections, Registrant Protections, Closed Generics, String Similarity, IDNs, Security and Stability, Applicant Reviews, Role of Application Comment, and Name Collisions.
The Working Group has completed its review of topics under Overarching Issues, Pre-Launch Activities, and Application Submission. It is currently finishing its review of topics related to Application Evaluation/Criteria. Please see the WG
Work Plan
for details.
|
|
Work Track 5 has completed its substantive review of
public comments
received on the Work Track 5
Supplemental Initial Report
. This report focuses exclusively on the issue of geographic names at the top level. The Work Track leveraged a
summary document
to examine themes in the comments received.
The Work Track is now finishing discussions on several key topics, including the treatment of non-capital city names and whether there should be additional geographic terms not included in the 2012 Applicant Guidebook.
|
|
The Working Group plans to cover the following in September and October (see
Work Plan
for schedule):
- Dispute Proceedings: including topics Objections and Accountability Mechanisms.
- String Contention Resolution: including topics Community Applications, Auctions: Mechanisms Last Resort, and Private Resolution of Contention Sets (including Private Auctions).
- Contracting: including topics Base Registry Agreement, Registrar Non-Discrimination / Registry/Registrar Standardization, and Registrar Support for New gTLDs.
- Pre-Delegation: including topic Registry System Testing.
- Post-Delegation: including topics TLD Rollout, Second Level Rights Protection Mechanisms, and Contractual Compliance.
|
|
The Work Track will send its recommendations to the full Working Group for consideration. Recommendations will be subject to a consensus call in the full Working Group. The Work Track seeks to conclude in October 2019.
|
|
In June 2014, the GNSO Council established a Discussion Group that was intended to evaluate the experiences of the 2012 round gTLD Program and to identify possible areas for future GNSO policy development. The Discussion Group’s
deliverables
served as the basis for the GNSO Council request for a Preliminary Issue Report in June of 2015.
Following the publication of the
Final Issue Report
, the GNSO Council adopted the
charter
for the PDP Working Group, which began its work in February 2016. The Working Group initially concentrated on a set of overarching issues. It later conducted deliberations on additional topics in its charter using five separate Work Tracks: Work Track 1 - Overall Process/Support/Outreach, Work Track 2 - Legal/Regulatory, Work Track 3: String Contention/Objections & Disputes, Work Track 4: Internationalized Domain Names/Technical & Operations, Work Track 5: Geographic Names at the Top Level.
|
|
The Discussion Group identified a number of subjects that may require further analysis and possible formulation of policy language. There are existing policy recommendations adopted by the GNSO Council and ICANN Board, which will remain in place unless the PDP WG determines that changes are needed.
|
|
|
|
To join this effort, please email the
All are welcome!
|
|
Follow the GNSO on Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
